EUROPE: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, North Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, (Turkey), Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican City...SPECIAL THANKS 2020 TO EUROPE'S LIVESMATTER.CITY coalition: barcelona rome oxford-glasgow vienna
2020q1 when vaccine is born how can it be marketed so 7.5 billion
2020q2 from how can students and teachers help celebrate advancing sdgs on 75th year of UN

The Economist's entrepreneurial revolutions 49th annual league table of places sees barcelona and vienna playing most critical roles as tipping points of sdgs collapse unless we get back to understanding 90% of innovations advancing human lot start small deep and long in communi8ty or family lab not 90 day extraction mba thrones. Hong MOng takes over as startup epicentral in spite of western fake media to contrary
timelines of
worldclassbrands -what if purpose of brand leaders will exponentially determine success or failure of our final 40 year examination in species sustainability -launched in 1988 with a series in the economist - year of brand, death of brand manager- what needed to die as the world united around death of distance technolgues was the advertising paradim of battling for minds with a different brand for every new product and in every different language- what would be the mos importnant new geres of brands? places? faiths? big data local platforms - how would adam smith and james watt quarter of a century 1760-2010 morph into humanising moore machine intel than human as we entered 4G and 5G decades: back in 1960s alumni of moore had promised 100 times more computation power every decade 0g 1970s onwards - thats an exponential of trillion times moore by end of 2030 than needed to code moon landing- such power depended on trust in collaboration around globalistion's most purposeful brand leaders as well as integration of community sized enterprise value chains if sustainabity golals were to be a united reality not just a greenwashing game

universityofstars -what if world class sporting leagues prepped uber champoins- once you're too old to stay top of the pops in sports song or beauty, what if you already know an sdg leader you want to share your and her alumni with
-launched 2004 in delhi with 100- gandhians after seeing some early reality tv competitions as well as writing up 184's story of the critical deadlines of morphing digital and pre-digital media to be the sustainably deepest of both not the socially most trivial -more

Fascinating to track with hudson institute how many european countries have given up with the official advice of mr trump on building g5 and are letting carriers just do it with whomever offers the best deal washington dc technology's biggest leap -breaking 14 nov - many nations and continents are racing into 2020s with probably the biggest innovation crisis ever du8e to greed of governments spectrum auctions at $G #G- failure to let the peoples use 5g video would 5G exist without china -discussion welcome

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Whither Economics - Social or Anti Social  Inter-Generational Exponential Design

What systems determine some places to be job (livelihood) rich and others poor? An first version of question started to be exciting for our species to ask from 1700. Before that most people lived at subsistence levels. Over the next quarter of a millennium to mid 20th century, some peoples grew over 100 times more health and wealth, and others grew barely at all. Reasonings include:

  • Colonisation -where markets over time designed trades to coloniser's gain and colonised's lost
  • Laws or their governance designed for the few not for all the peoples to flourish-Alternatively constitutions where many gained but an underclass was spun (inside or outside the place's borders)
  • Wars externally or intwrnally (including lack of personal safety and communal care for the child)
  • Changes in technology designed future-carelessly with respect to some or most peoles livelihoods
  • Short-termism with regards to the next commons or infrastructures ( note risk of selling off a commons as a short-term gain for one generation and a long-term degradation of livelihoods)
  • Failure to value family drive in which capiatl structures savings to invest in next generation having better livelihood opportunities than their parents
  • Failure to design in sustainability into what the purpose of scientific innovation and open society is driven by

We can all know of listings like these. For example scottish alumni of adam smith diarised them. Scotland in early 1700s got colonised by London. Over the next century most scots had to go abroad to develop livelihoods. Scots were there in US of A to celebrate how and why the declaration of independence ended market colonisation- the first sentence reference to happiness and freedom voices the goal fof designing a livelihoods rich place by and for all peoples.

You can then watch how the US suffered internal war and then design of underclass (ie blacks, and gun-ridden places) whilst in other respects celebrating fastest development around the biggest national market- until middle of 20th century- when a new crossroads of humanity started to map a borderless world

Back in the 19th century, additional views were recorded out of the continuing epicentre of Empire and the hope that transformation to commonwealth could  be the greater good that industrial revolution would share around the world. By 1843, the scottish enetrepreneur and statistician James Wilson came down to London to mediate the future of livelihood transparency and expel from parliament the majority of MPs by then sponsored by vested interests. His journal : The Economist. The first centenary autobiography in 1943 is a wonderful resource if you are concerned with livelihood Economics

From 1946, a new challenge to livelihood investment emerged - one Keynes denoument of general theory had such foresight in warning about. A breed of macroeconomist changed their number 1 purpose. Instead of maximising livelihoods for all, they hired themselves out to various forces concerned with the big get bigger.

Coincidentally, humanity started its greatest gamble ever- what was to become that of spending 4000 times more on global communications technology in 2030 than in 1946 -see for how to report on this changeworld dynamic

By start of last quarter of 20thC, humanity's most valuable question came into view : would global and local communications spends had been systematically designed to end poverty by 2030 (ie end wasted livelihoods wherever children be born)? Would the vast majority of human race unite around this endeavour so as not to globally fall into  Big Brother's endgame -spinning loss of sustainability of humanity.

This most exciting mediation challenge and valuation of leadership is the curriculum which The Economist from 1972  debated as Entrepreneurial Revolution of the Net Generation

The Games

Top movements 5 decades 5 billion millennilas jobs
Post-digital ie since majority of 7 billion beings moble connecetd

5.1 Special resource started in 1962 : The Economist End-PovertyArchives Celebrating 2015 UN Womens Empowerment Week April 2015 -featuring half a century's leadership of Asian Pacific www centure mapping
2.1 Health Guides    1.1 Emerging version of open water guide
Views: 5

No comments:

Post a Comment