economisteurope.com invites parents, youth to ask can we end legacy of empire in time to sustain C21

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

brillaint speech of macron welcoming egypt leader - te best way to improve rights is to build trade livelihoods where those arfe win-wins

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

5bis golden-english ::: what if 4 most valuable knowledge economies were connected by education to win-win with youth as sustainability generation? 4 can save the world: chinese english mother tongue coding

..BRI Changing future history: to simplify the last 500 years: From 1500 -1946 Empires ruled the waves; led by Britain a few nations colonised others; they designed currencies & trading routes (ports. later trains, roads...) so empire nations got bigger with often zero gain for colonies. After world war 2, Colonisation fell apart; in the East starting in Japan then Korea then Chinese Diaspora superports eg HK Taiwan Singapore win-win trade grew maximising connectivity of superports, supertrains, bridges/tunnels. By 1975 Japan became 2nd wealthiest and Chinese Diapora 3rd stringest financial network. The Diaspora inward invested in intergenerational rejuvenation of the 1.5 billion mainland chienese with superb trading infrastructure. Prior to 1500, the Chinese had been the most advanced civilisation in the East and the med sea trasding nations in the West- see eg Marco Polos Joyful adentures across the Eurasian Silk Road,. When Xi Jinping became presidnet in 2012, he started asking what if the whole world mapped BRI: where would superpoirts, rails brdges be put so everyone would win-win trade, how much greener could win-win trade routes become as 1000 times more digital connectivity than 1946 mobilises how people shared knowhow. Today over 100 national leaders debate Xi's co-creativity innovations at BRI entrepreneurial revolution summits including WISE, new banking, youth expos at the coming alibaba olympics. Could investing in trade routes be more efficient than wars; could youth be empowered to joyfully bridge cultures and arts that colonisation had accidentally split apart; could every locality unite around sustainability goals andf community-for-all celebrations in time to save humanity from climate wars with mother nature.

good news

questions on economics or education of sustainability exponentials always welcome - isabella@unacknowledgedgiant.com

viewing the world's trading belt from

1 russia's viewpoint

2 east europe's

3 west europe's

4 med sea

5 middle east

40 years on - do you value chiense sustainability milennials enough? In 1977 only a few months after the fall of the gang of four, The Economist's Norman Macrae wrote - what was in store for China was an end to boring ideology and a drive for economic growth. It did not make any difference whether the man carrying out this policy was Ping or Pong or Deng. The same is true in 1995. In recent interviews Singapore's Lee Kuan ew shared this view:

The Chinese are not ordinary people you know. They are the products of a very self-conscious civiliisation. self-conscious because they know they once did it (led the world) and now they are out of the race, they must get back into the race -more at www.economistchina.net

Alumni of windsor castle consultation nov 2015 include

Dianne Davis President ICCC,

Jeremy Farrar director welcome foundation

Sam Pitroda

Denis Gilhooly UN Executive Secretary Broadband Commission and Executive Director Global Digital Health

Gisela Loohlein (Ajman University and AK Designo Dubai)

simon cavelle Scarib Design

good news

Greece

Dont cry for me Europe, the truth is I was never with you.

Do you agree that losing sustainability would be the greatest intergenerational mistake of all time?

My father started the curriculum of Entrepreneurial Revolution at The Economist in 1972 to try to help peoples prevent this error as death of distance made all of our livelihoods- and social joys - more connected than separated. By 1972, father decided that the most valuable question he could explore for the rest of his life was: what will be the consequences if humans spend 4000 times more money and time on worldwide communications in 2030 that 1946. Will elders joyfully invest in their next generation's open society sustainability or not?

1984 more timelines from 1984 at regional reporting webs such as www.economistamerica.com and www.economistasia.net and www.economisteurope.com

ARCHIVES

Norman Macrae had observed a doubling of such spend every 7 years since 1946 and moon landing's intel moores law of silicon chips, satellites coming death of cost of telecoms as function of distance made this scenario the biggest (most sudden transformation) to human race's 4 hemispheres ever. In the 1930s people as varied as Einstein, Orwell and Von Hayek had already warned that the greatest compound threat of technological connectivity would be big brothers endgame; so entrepreneurial revolution aimed to search out the alternative positive maps

Between 1972 and 1984 Norman did 2 main things:

round the world leadeship surveys- who ha stories to share on pro-youth investment -eg in llooking forward to mobilising coming sustainability solutions

clarified timelines to 2025 which every parent and society needed to track so that there would not be an inter-generational failure to invest in net generation open societies and orbits gravitated towards sustainability

Norman also clarified that the purposes of some trillion dollar markets would give clearest of all warning signs of exponentially risking intergenerational loss of sustainability

Was it possible that an elder generation could fear or otherwise blind themselves to caring about next generation markets of health, education, banking?

I health services got more and more costly that would indicate the 4000 times more communications spend was not bringing down degrees of freedom in sharing life critical info; it might also indicate that health secrice design was being prioritised to increase working lifetimes (ie by making sure basic care for all children and mothers out of every locality); and knowing how politicians short-term interests put nations at risk, it was quite likely that places with elder populations would design systems putting youth in ever greatest debt (not one of the most interesting worldwide analyses you can do in 2015 is average age - around the world half of people are under 28,5 but in what we may call old countries, more than half of eople are in their mid 40s or more- and young countries go as low as having half their populace under 19. Pretty clearly global social health needs partnerships between young and old countries which are without borders. But will politicians and national single interest groups help free such a future

Is it possible to imagine that educators would become so insecure about the changes that an open educational world could celebrate around milennials generation that they will instead hang on to 4 monopolies of what is taught, researched, examined, certified- even if what teyhy arfe expert at increasingly has no link with youth livelihhods and where redundant methods of ever school and university has to have its own experts cause costs of higher education to put students in huge debts (at a time when their parents have also messed up cost of properties in biggest cities)

aND IS IT POSSIBLE TO IMAGINE THAT GOVERNMENTS WILL TREAT BIG BANKS WITH SPECIAL RULES WHICH PROMISE THE NEXT GENERATION WILL BAIL THEM OUT HOWEVER MANY CRIMINAL SUBPRIME AND PONZI SCHEMES THEY SERIALLY COMMIT

If you live in a place where none of above is spinning 2015 now then your chances of sustainability are high and of course we'd love to pass on your knowhow t millennials who do need entrepreneurial revolution curricula now

===========================

Stories from Norman's invitation to search out 30000 microfranchises\of sustainability.. Its extraordinary failure iof bithe aid and education markets that every most exciting microfranchasie solution we fnd ultimately gets less and less clearly communicated over time and across the world- consider the exciting cases of aravind and grameen shakti

we the peoples need to unwind european union- which parts do you nee to unwind to have a livelihood

eg scotland and wales need their own voices- net generation needs direct export sme support- eg smes in china have overtaken smes in us at borderless exports 2014 when both contients were at 40 billion dolars - china expecetd to grow 4 fold by 2018- whats the trade out of europe by smes through web

nobody needs a common currency

europe bureucartas have been uselss at lanning because you cant plan one continent i fast moving age- but they dont even have correct structure for peace at borders

the whole parliament of separte mps in unnecessary

20 social media and open tech wizards

19 nursing

18 mobilising medical apps

17 nutrition to inner city

16 bioenergy

15 ending waste/carbon

14 crop science

13 funding and incubation hubbed round emerging graduates

12 recruiting superstars to youth community projects related to their stardom

11 women entrepreneurs

10 creating jobs for girls around orphanages or villages

9 youth in foreign assistance

8 developing missing curriculum of youth - ge financial literacy

7 helping regenerate with whatever is a state's most underused skill base

6 any other social service youth most passionate about developing ground up social lab -eg our regions expertise included in atlanta 2012 included : the blind, teen pregnancy , ....

5 any millennium goal collaboration foreign embassies most want to linkin to dc through visiting or diaspora students with a particular focus on africa while obama can help celebrate that

4 anything that builds student trade relationships with china

3 anything that celebrates youth's greatest job creators

2 returning to banks with values

1 changing economists to be pro-youth

0 open content movement partnering of universities/colleges with job creators not examiners of theories- as you probably know bhuiyan's boss in alabama is an MIT alumn and aims to start a university of poverty in alabama round the sorts of processes that have made MIT alumni the number 1 job creating social network all over the world - linking dc into that during obama 2.1 may define what america's net generation contributes